Verified against 250M+ real papers

Academic writing that proves its sources.

Most AI invents citations that look right and aren't. CiteGood writes from real literature and checks every claim against the source it cites — before you ever paste it.

no card · 0 fabricated references · every claim source-linked
Live verification

Spaced repetition strengthens long-term retention because each retrieval attempt reconsolidates the memory trace, an effect that compounds across sessions.[1]

Roediger & Karpicke · Psych. Science · 2006doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
Repeated retrieval promotes and reconsolidates learning better than restudying, producing large gains in long-term retention.
Supported  claim matches source
0.94 match
100%
of citations link to a real, openable source — no dead DOIs, no invented authors.
3-way
each sentence graded supported, partial, or unsupported.
250M+
papers searched live — CiteGood writes from the literature, not memory.
Typical AI

“…retrieval practice improves retention (Thompson & Reyes, 2019)[1].”

A citation that looks academic. The paper doesn't exist — a plausible author, year, and DOI, invented.

CiteGood

“…retrieval practice improves retention[1]” — [1] points to a real 2006 study and the exact passage that backs it.

Every reference is real and checked against the source. Unsupported claims are flagged before your draft.

CiteGood · write grounded, cite real sources